TW,
To reply to your question about how the system determines debit/credit for
different billing types -
This is determined by the SD Document category in the billing document type
definition (and the logic is hardcoded by sap). The condition records for
a credit memo and debit memo would look exactly similar in table konv. See
below how data from konv is made comparable with GL postings:
select * from konv
where knumv = vbrk-knumv
and kappl = 'V'
and knumh in it_knumh
and ( sakn1 = s_hkont-low or sakn2 = s_hkont-low ).
if vbrk-vbtyp = 'O' or *"credit memo*
vbrk-vbtyp = 'N' or *"invoice cancellation*
vbrk-vbtyp = '6'. *"intercompany credito memo*
gv_kwert = gv_kwert - ( konv-kwert * vbrk-kurrf ).
elseif vbrk-vbtyp = 'S' or *"cancellation*
vbrk-vbtyp = 'M' or *"Invoice*
vbrk-vbtyp = 'P' or *"Debit memo*
vbrk-vbtyp = '5'. *"intercompany invoice*
gv_kwert = gv_kwert + ( konv-kwert * vbrk-kurrf ).
endif.
endselect.
Now, that said, when I read the thread from the beginning, I am totally at
a loss. There is no process clarity. Who is the customer? - The dealer
or the end customer? How can you be able update a condition table with the
dealer's sale price upfront and still want to sell the material at a higher
price to the dealer and complicate the process by issuing a credit memo
later for an already known amount? Does the ownership pass to the dealer
at all? Is the dealer actually paying the $100 at any time?? Who does the
end customer pay? I feel the selling price (a list price or MSRP) of
$100 here is only for computing the commission and has no financial
relevance. There are many questions here. The original poster needs to
explain the requirement in simple terms. Since there seems to be a
physical movement of goods to the dealer, I would consider a consignment
approach rather than rebates. Rebates approach would be appropriate if the
client is billing the end customer directly, with commission payable to the
dealer. That said, the pricing procedures put up so far cannot be
commented on. It is not enough that they perform to the technical
expectation, it is absolutely necessary that they conform to the business
process requirement, which in this case, is murky at best.
| | | ---------------Original Message---------------
From: Typewriter
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 11:46 PM
Subject: Pricing Procedure for Indirect Sales
Hi Rajan, experts,
Could you please answer, explain Part 1, in my previous post?
Part 1 - With the same settings for Account determination,
- for a Credit memo G2 billing type a credit posting is done on customer receivable account and debit posting on revenue account.
- where as for F2 billing type a debit posting is done on customer receivable account and credit posting on revenue account.
What - in the system - is triggering this (manner of posting), I am not sure. Maybe it is SD document category in VOFA.
Members please clarify / explain this. |
| __.____._ Copyright © 2011 Toolbox.com and message author.
Toolbox.com 4343 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 280, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
| |  PSD Rajan
SAP Logistics Sales and Distribution Helper
Posted helpful replies on 5 threads in a group to earn a Bronze Achievement Popular White Papers
In the Spotlight   _.____.__ |
